Skip to main content


Meanwhile, this is actually happening: Trump is rolling back anti-bribery regulations, arguing that our inability to bribe other countries is unfairly disadvantaging US business interests.

"President Donald Trump is set to sign an executive order rolling back enforcement of a law that makes it illegal for US companies to bribe foreign officials, arguing that the restriction puts American firms at a disadvantage.

Trump is ordering Attorney General Pam Bondi to pause actions taken under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act until she issues new enforcement guidelines, according to a fact sheet on the executive order, a copy of which was seen by Bloomberg News. All current and past actions will also be reviewed."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-10/trump-to-loosen-enforcement-of-us-law-banning-overseas-bribes?srnd=homepage-americas

in reply to BrianKrebs

when is he going to revamp tax code and fire a bunch of people at the irs?
in reply to BrianKrebs

sorry I’m a bit thick but can the president just decide not to enforce certain laws? Is there precedent for this?
in reply to Padjo

@Padjo Of course not. But that hasn't stopped him yet from asserting that and from ignoring court orders and blatantly setting up constitutional challenges more or less everywhere.
in reply to BrianKrebs

Yes, it does put them at a disadvantage. Too bad.

US firms should behave like US firms and espouse American/Western morals. If a firm operates in the USA, then it should not promote bribery elsewhere.

If the subject was not "bribery" and instead was "use of child labor", everyone would be against weakening protections.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to BrianKrebs

I mean, elect someone with no integrity and this is what one can expect. It’s just now out in the open for everyone to see. And he’s inviting all his billionaire supporters to to come out of hiding with him.
in reply to BrianKrebs

This was an episode in “Madam Secretary.”

Maybe the White House should watch “The West Wing” instead - or “The Newsroom.” Or just hire Aaron Sorkin.

in reply to BrianKrebs

[World] sets EUBA models where src=US as inside threat.
[World] left channel
in reply to BrianKrebs

How many steps is it from bribing foreign officials to being bribed _by_ foreign officials, then corporations in either direction, then private citizens in either direction? He obviously wants to grift, so where does it stop once in effect?
in reply to BrianKrebs

I guess Joe Biden is off the hook, and Hunter too?
in reply to BrianKrebs

well, i mean, it is isn't it? not that i support it. same as countries that don't really have "privacy" laws gives them an advantage in AI.

but the idea of a "shining city of/on the hill" (j.f. kennedy and reagan both used this term)[which i always track back to Austine's "City of God", as well Jesus' Sermon on the Mount] is that we hold ourselves to integrity EVEN in the face of possible defeat

seems that any political leader so endowed with heavenly authority should hold scrutiny against such foundational christian ideas... but we've collectively been thru this already and see that plenty of biblical illiterate people find no conflict here :blobshrug:

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to BrianKrebs

The demented psychopathic First Felon is busy building his own mafia state, with the help of the Heritage Foundation, Leonard Leo, Elon Musk, Opus Dei, Clarence Thomas et al & their criminal subversive "Project 2025".

A lot to roll back, when he's finally in geriatric prison care.

#RuleOfLaw #Project2025 #Coup #FirstFelon #CoupDEtat #Subversion #Insurrection #Corruption #Bribery #MafiaState #AccountabilityMatters #Law #Justice #Democracy #RuleOfThePeople #ProtectThePeople #USPol #USPolitics

in reply to BrianKrebs

At some point the side effect will be that no US company can do any business with any #EU country any more. That's because without these laws corporations are forced to use #bribes to maximise the investor ROI. This automatically contradicts up front requirements for any company doing business in the EU with any country. This also applies to the largest #cloud providers.
in reply to BrianKrebs

new way to grift? “Bribe another country” and basically have them store some of it for him to get at a later date?
in reply to BrianKrebs

As with all of FDR's progressive legislation, big companies have opposed and wanted to undo the FCPA since Congress enacted it in 1977. Why did Congress enact it? For one thing, a major bribery scandal involving Boeing in Japan brought down the govt.

Companies have managed to work with it for nearly 50 years. They can do it for another 50. But notice how Trump hasn't the balls to ask Congress to rescind the legislation? Gutless braggart.

in reply to BrianKrebs

It's important to point out that this is illegal. The president CANNOT make laws. AN EXECUTIVE ORDER IS NOT A LAW. ONLY CONGRESS CAN MAKE LAWS. ONLY CONGRESS OR THE SCOTUS CAN END LAWS. THE PRESIDENT CANNOT "ROLL BACK" LAWS.
in reply to BrianKrebs

not a surprise though, i clearly remember the interview he did when 45, paraphrasing... why shouldn't i get election help from other countries?
in reply to BrianKrebs

assuming, for a moment, the absurdly unlikely hypothetical that there will be another free and fair US presidential election in my lifetime, I'd suggest that anyone considering taking advantage of this to familiarise themselves with the statute of limitations on the FCPA. Just in case.
in reply to BrianKrebs

They should rename this country Freedonia, after the country Groucho Marx runs in Duck Soup. One of the lines from his opening song is, "I will not stand for anything that's crooked or unfair. I'm strictly on the up and up so everyone beware. If anyone's caught taking graft, and I don't get my share, we stand him up against the wall and pop goes the weasel."
in reply to BrianKrebs

JFC... could there be anything more "Trumpy" than that??? "Get the criming out in the open." Absolutely mind-boggling.
in reply to BrianKrebs

Donald Trump's quiver of negotiating tactics runs the gamut from A to B: extortion or bribery, bribery or extortion.
in reply to BrianKrebs

He’ll also accept bribes as part of business.